Showing posts with label productivity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label productivity. Show all posts

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Remember (and Protect) the Important Stuff: Part One- On the Horns of the Password Dilemma

The Setup

Last weekend I had two of my children in the car and we were headed somewhere (I have forgotten where, which is one of the points of this post, so read on).  I stopped at the corner store (it might be a BP, it could be a Circle K-- it doesn't matter -- again read on) because I was dangerously low on fuel. (One reason I had run it down below empty is because I spend so much time keeping thousands of things in my head that crowd out the need to be mindful of important information like fuel levels).

When I went to turn the pump on, I could not remember my debit card PIN (not "PIN number").  While this lapse was not catastrophic, because I could choose the "credit" function, I wondered what I could do to make sure this did not happen again.  (And lest you point out that I could store my PIN in my smartphone, you are absolutely correct but that is not the point I am making here).

The Challenge

I (and you) have a limited amount of time and energy to expend in a day.  And as I have discovered as an adult (when these things have mattered), I simply cannot remember (or do) everything, but have to pick and choose wisely.  As Scott Hanselman put itProductivity is not about about doing everything; it is about doing the right things and ignoring the rest.  And when I cannot remember something important (like a PIN), I choose to believe that is the result of unimportant things crowding out that fact.

So what "unimportant things" do I choose to remember?  Well, in addition to regrettably unforgettable commercial jingles from the 1970s, the entirety of School House Rock, and movie lines from my youth, one likely group of suspects is the myriad usernames, passwords, PINs, etc. I use online.  I am pretty sure that these online presences are the "right things," because I can't conceive of physical banking and shopping anymore.  And it doesn't appear that the Internet is going away.  But the exercise of recalling how to access these services, as well as the attendant time and frustration involved in retrieving and resetting user credentials when I cannot recall them, are both unproductive and inefficient.

In short, I need my day (my time) and my brain (my energy) for the important stuff.  It wouldn't be a post on this blog without yet another tip of the cap to The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Done Right, and Gawande's point that making sure all of the little stuff is taken care of frees us up to do the heavy lifting.  Put another way, as I have written here as well, I only have a finite amount of brain energy to expend in a given day, and I can scarcely afford to burn it trying to remember a password. 

The Dilemma 
 
Of course, one option is to use one password for all your sites.  Less to remember, so fast and easy, what's not to like?  I would be willing to wager that most computer users (i.e you the reader) do just that because it is so easy and convenient.  However, using the same password for more than one site can have disastrous consequences in the event just one site you use is hacked.  Put it this way:  you wouldn't even consider using one "master" key for your all your physical locks (office, home, etc.), even though that would certainly be easier.  And  you don't because if the one place with the weakest security is compromised (e.g. a former employee fails to return an office key) the whole system can be compromised.  That is exactly what you are doing if you have one password.  And you are in even bigger trouble if your password is so simple it could be compromised by a brute force attack, or if it can be easily guessed (like . . . wait for it . . . "password").  If you need further convincing,  please read James Fallows' "Hacked" in the The Atlantic to make this point sink in.

On the other hand, although the process of creating, changing, and keeping track of strong, unique passwords is essential, doing so taps time and energy.  Establishing and routinely modifying a unique case-sensitive,12-character password with letters, numbers and characters for multiple sites is the stuff of cryptographers and mathematicians. And recall the the way you felt the last time you couldn't remember your password, (or your username, reminder, or challenge question), and the frustration you experienced in stopping your transaction or interaction and going through the process of retrieving and resetting.  Heaven forbid you actually have to get on the phone with someone to get logged in. 

So until a better password system comes along,  wouldn't it be nice if you could conserve your time and energy by keeping only one password in your head (leaving more room for other important stuff), while at the same time browsing and transacting safely and securely?

In the next post, I will discuss one such solution.

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Some Thoughts on "Email: The Reality in Law in 2013"

My friend and colleague Christian Stegmaier has penned (typed?) a thought-provoking post over at his new blog Lawyer as Service Professional.  In summary, because email is the primary communications medium for clients, Christian posits those attorneys who choose to "manage" email (i.e. put off responses to clients) risk compromising their very role as responsive service professionals.  In other words, email is the reality of client communication, so think very carefully about de-emphasizing or overlooking the importance of that medium.

I could not agree more with Christian's basic premise:  attorneys are in the service business, and there is absolutely nothing to prevent clients from voting with their feet if we do not meet their expectations.   Responsiveness is certainly one of the most important if not the most important (and consistent) ways in which attorneys can serve clients, and email by its very nature enables lightning response. 

However, I want to mention a couple of ways in which undue email emphasis may limit a service professional's effectiveness toward her clients.  First, the nature of what we do (deadlines, impending trials and hearings, etc.) requires attorneys to prioritize where we spend our time and attention.  And the typical email inbox by default has a tendency to make the most recent message the most important.  To quote David Allen, (about whom I have written previously here, here, and here) the inbox causes us to confuse the urgent with the important.  In my view, taking steps to manage and prioritize your inbox is critical, if only so you can better separate the wheat from the chaff.  If you are serious about prioritizing and managing your inbox, you must explore Scott Hanselman's Computer Zen. And there is no space or time to fully explore this point, but email is awful for collaboration with clients.  As we move forward (irrespective of the current reality), we will all serve our clients better when we employ the best medium to facilitate that service.

Similarly, another critical service attorneys provide to their clients is thoughtful consideration of their cases, problems and issues.  And as Jason Fried (and countless others) have observed, meaningful work (concentration and attention) cannot take place amidst too many distractions.  More pointedly, a brief I am writing would suffer greatly if I answer email messages (or allow other distractions) while stringing together (presumably cogent) ideas. To Christian's important point, if client expectations demand immediate email responses, perhaps designating a staff person to provide personalized responses (in the same way your phone would get answered when you are unavailable) would make sense.

Finally, clients understand that our rapid responsiveness naturally gives way at times in order that we devote that full attention to the matters we do on their behalf.  The client for whom we are arguing an appeal or motion, taking or defending a deposition, or trying a case fully expect and demand that the email requests of other clients remain unanswered and unviewed-- at least until those matters are concluded.  And I certainly hope that the desire to provide lightning response doesn't take place on I-26.  

In sum, email is the communications reality (at least for now), but that doesn't mean that the inbox need be the hub of a lawyer's daily existence.  It is a useful tool, if managed properly but not for everything an attorney does.  And sometimes only stepping away from that inbox, if only for short amounts of time, is the only way to recognize the reality beyond that interface.

Comments and responses always welcome at @jjpringlesc.


Thursday, April 19, 2012

Earl's List: More Productivity Tools and Tips for Law Practices

This post could also be called a mass-share (or Spring Cleaning) of items piling up in my Evernote "software" notebook.  Here goes:

9 iPad Productivity Tips:   (RocketMatter)  I especially appreciate knowing how to lock-in Portrait or Landscape mode.

5 Ways to Put LinkedIn to Work For Your Business (via @kevinokeefe):  With 150 million business members, it is a resource you have to figure out how to tap.

5 Tips on Using Bcc in Outlook Email (Outlook Blog via @tommighell):  no need to fly "blind" anymore.

Becoming a Mind-Mapping Jedi (Law Practice Today):  (Columbia's own Dave Maxfield is a co-author)  We attorneys tend to miss the forest for the trees.  Mind-mapping helps you "begin with the end in mind."

5 Microsoft Office Hacks to Finish Tasks Faster (Lawyerist).  Templates and short-cuts and styles.  Make Word work for you, not the other way around.

21 Best Tools and Apps to Significantly Boost Your Work Productivity (via Attorney At Work).  Something for everyone here.  The goal setting apps look particularly intriguing.

Make Your Own Shortcuts in Word (Gadgetwise):  The Developer tab is very useful.

Update:  The Hytech Lawyer's Updated List of iPad Apps for Lawyers

Monday, December 12, 2011

Some Thoughts for 2012: Specific Goals, Getting Better, and Thinking Big

It is that time of year again.  Will this be the year that your wonderful intentions are put into motion, or will they remain on the shelf, in your head, or stuffed away in a file folder, and lose the name of action?

A very succinct explanation of how to plan your 2012 is an installment of Cordell Parvin's Practical Success series entitled "Making 2012 Your Best Year Ever." This article is not even two pages long, so there is no excuse for not reading it.

Parvin emphasizes not only the importance of writing out goals, but also explicitly articulating why you are pursuing those goals:  "You have to have a good answer to the 'why' question to motivate you, energize you, and cause you to have the discipline and commitment to achieve the goal."  And Parvin's guide necessarily includes setting out the actions necessary to achieve that goal, as well as something you can do in the next week to get started. 

Look here and here for more on the importance of specific goal-setting that not only makes the process practical and attainable, but also ensures that the goals in question are yours.

If you are looking for ways to get better as an attorney (also of critical emphasis in Parvin's article), consider the Legal Productivity list of Top Ten Legal Podcasts, and the Kennedy-Mighell Report 2012 Technology Gift Guide.  In particular, I am intrigued by the technology training offered at Lynda.com.  As I have written before here and elsewhere, these days there are virtually unlimited resources for making you better, so you have no excuse.

And finally, even though you must be practical, you must also think big.  For additional inspiration about the power of big ideas and to encourage you to dream large, listen to  HBR's 2012 List of Audacious Ideas.

Friday, October 28, 2011

Earl's List: More Productivity Tools and Tips for Law Practices

Kennedy-Mighell Report podcast iPads for Lawyers.  Their guest is David Sparks, author of iPad at Work.  Lengthy discussion about the things that the iPad does well in a law practice, as well as those for which it is less well-suited.  Several particular apps are discussed, and mentioned in the show notes blog.

Continuing that theme,  The Hytech Lawyer's Top 20 IPad Applications for Summer 2011.

Word Tips to Make Your Life Easier.  From the Gallagher Law Library at the University of Washington School of Law.

Must-Have Software and Gadgets for Paralegals.  From Law Technology News

Five Firefox Add-Ons to Boost Your Productivity.   From the Legal Productivity Blog at Rocket Matter.

Three Microsoft Outlook Quick Tricks.  From the Lawyerist.

Monday, October 3, 2011

Productivity Tips for Attorneys (And All Computer Users)

Once again, The Kennedy-Mighell Report offers some very simple ways to improve your computer desktop work experience.  Easy Productivity Improvements is a thirty-minute podcast that every desk jockey should hear.


If you are working with or comparing more than one document, having multiple monitors is a must.  And price is hardly an obstacle.  Click here for Microsoft's tips on effective dual monitor setup.

If you have Windows 7, go here for Jim Calloway's advice on how to make two monitors effectively become four monitors.

And if you have to use only one monitor, press ALT-TAB to cycle through all your open programs quickly.

For more keyboard shortcuts, click here for Kennedy's ABA article Quick Cuts: Save Time With a Few Strokes at the Keyboard

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Jason Fried: Why Work Doesn't Happen At Work

A very thought-provoking TED talk by Jason Fried, co-founder of 37 Signals and co-author of Rework.

Fried explores why meaningful work often gets done at places and times (home, while traveling, on the weekends) that do not involve the office and the work week.

Meaningful work, like sleep, requires long periods without interruption, and the workday is "shredded" into small snippets of time because of numerous interruptions. Particularly interesting is the observation that when a stage of sleep is interrupted you have to start again, and consequently no one would expect a person to have a good night's sleep if woken up numerous times. Why do we expect anything different out of a work day that is a parade of interruptions?

Interruptions at work are special, because they typically aren't voluntary. "M&Ms" (Managers and Meetings), cannot be avoided. Moreover, meetings aren't work, and organizations do not fully value the lost time and productivity occasioned by meetings (e.g, a one-hour meeting with eight participants is an 8-hour meeting).

Fried offers three suggestions to make the office a better place to work: 1) establish periods of time where communications are forbidden ("No Talk Thursday"), to allow uninterrupted work to take place; 2) switch from active communication to passive communication (email, im, collaborative tools -- they are certainly distracting, but they can be turned off --unlike someone in your office), and 3) cancel the next meeting.

Good ideas about ways you make sure you Do The Work and overcome the Resistance, Quiet the Lizard Brain, and emphasize the Important, Not the Urgent.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Powering Up Your Personal Productivity

The latest episode of the Kennedy-Mighell Report is devoted to techniques designed to enhance productivity, and some technology that can be helpful.

Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell write and speak frequently on electronic discovery, practice management, technology, and other topics. Their guest on this podcast is Allison Shields.

Very timely and important information for attorneys trying to manage information.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

10 Big Ideas from GTD

David Allen is well-known for his book and personal productivity system Getting Things Done.

While actually reading the book is the best way to start emphasizing the important, getting everything out of your head, and focusing on the next action, Josh Kaufman, author of the Personal MBA, has written a review of GTD that is a great introduction and overview of how it works.

Thanks to David Barrett for bringing it to my attention.

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Stay on Target- Software that Disables Internet Access and More

The Economist describes several products that will disable Internet access and/or put your word processing screen in "full-screen, no-distraction mode."

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Managing the Productivity Paradox

Ideacast from the Harvard Business Review interviewing Tony Schwartz, author of The Way We Are Working Isn't Working.

Very instructive about the way we manage energy in trying to perform at high levels.

Friday, May 14, 2010